High frequency of Specific Polysaccharide Antibody Deficiency (SPAD) in adults with unexplained, recurrent and/or severe infections with encapsulated bacteria.

Archive ouverte

Stabler, Sarah | Lamblin, Catherine | Gaillard, Sacha | Juste, Nicolas | Mihailescu, Mirela | Viget, Nathalie | Sy Ndiaye, Thierno | Dzeing Ella, Arnaud | Weyrich, Pierre | Prevotat, Anne | Chenivesse, Cecile | Le Rouzic, Olivier | Mortuaire, Geoffrey | Vuotto, Fanny | Faure, Karine | Leurs, Amelie | Wallet, Frederic | Loiez, Caroline | Titecat, Marie | Le Guern, Rémi | Hachulla, Eric | Sanges, Sebastien | Etienne, Nicolas | Launay, David | Lopez, Benjamin | Bahuaud, Mathilde | Batteux, Frédéric | Dubucquoi, Sylvain | Gesquière-Lasselin, Cyrielle | Labalette, Myriam | Lefevre, Guillaume

Edité par CCSD ; Oxford University Press (OUP) -

International audience. BackgroundPrimary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) in adults are mainly revealed by recurrent and/or severe bacterial infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate a systematic research strategy of PIDs in adults with unexplained bacterial infections, with a special focus on specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD).MethodsIn this prospective multicenter study, inclusion criteria were recurrent benign upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) for at least two years (group 1), at least one upper or lower RTI requiring hospitalization (group 2), and/or at least one invasive infection documented with encapsulated bacteria (group 3). Main exclusion criteria were all local and general conditions that could explain infections. If no PID diagnosis was made, response to polysaccharide antigens was assessed using a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.ResultsFrom March 2015 to March 2020, 118 patients were included (37 males, median age of 41 years): 73, 17, and 28 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Forty-seven PIDs were diagnosed, giving an estimated frequency of 39.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] [30.4, 48.8]). SPAD was the most frequent diagnosis by far (n = 37/47, 78.7%), and was made in 23, 5, and 9 patients from groups 1 to 3, respectively. All SPAD patients received conjugate vaccines and, according to their infectious history, were on surveillance or treated with preventive antibiotics (n = 6) and/or with immunoglobulins replacement therapy (n = 10), the latter being dramatically efficient in all cases.ConclusionsConsidering its high prevalence among adults with unexplained recurrent and/or severe bacterial infections, SPAD should be screened in those patients.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT02972281.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Diagnosis, Characteristics, and Outcome of Selective Anti-polysaccharide Antibody Deficiencies In A Retrospective Cohort of 55 Adult Patients.

Archive ouverte | Perrard, Nicolas | CCSD

International audience. Selective anti-polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD) predisposes to encapsulated bacterial infections. The diagnosis is challenging, and literature reports are scarce in adult patients, w...

Reply to Gilchrist et al. and to Musher

Archive ouverte | Lopez, Benjamin | CCSD

International audience

C-Reactive protein as a diagnostic tool in differential diagnosis of hypereosinophilic syndrome and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–negative eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Archive ouverte | Leurs, Amélie | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...