Evidence for the efficacy of pre-harvest agricultural practices in mitigating food-safety risks to fresh produce in North America

Archive ouverte

Devarajan, Naresh | Weller, Daniel | Jones, Matthew | Adell, Aiko | Adhikari, Achyut | Allende, Ana | Arnold, Nicole | Baur, Patrick | Beno, Sarah | Clements, Donna | Olimpi, Elissa | Critzer, Faith | Green, Hyatt | Gorski, Lisa | Ferelli Gruber, Angela | Kovac, Jasna | Mcgarvey, Jeffery | Murphy, Claire | Murphy, Sarah | Navarro-Gonzalez, Nora | Owen, Jeb | Pires, Alda | Richard, Nicole | Samaddar, Sandipan | Schmidt, Radomir | Scow, Kate | Shariat, Nikki | Smith, Olivia | Spence, Austin | Stoeckel, Don | Tran, Thao | Wall, Gretchen | Karp, Daniel

Edité par CCSD ; Frontiers Media -

International audience. Consumption of contaminated produce remains a leading cause of foodborne illness. Increasingly, growers are altering agricultural practices and farm environments to manage food-safety hazards, but these changes often result in substantial economic, social, and environmental costs. Here, we present a comprehensive evidence synthesis evaluating the efficacy of soil, non-crop vegetation, animal, landscape, and irrigation water management strategies aimed at reducing produce-safety risk in North America. We systematically summarized findings from 78 peer-reviewed papers on the effect of 21 management practices on the prevalence, abundance, or survival of four foodborne pathogens (i.e., E. coli, Salmonella spp., Listeria spp ., and Campylobacter spp .), resulting in 113 summaries. We then organized a 30-member expert panel, who used these summaries to evaluate the impact of each practice on food-safety outcomes. While more than half of the practices were too understudied to confidently evaluate their impact on food safety, the panel did identify several practices that were associated with reduced preharvest food-safety risks, including not using raw manure, separating crop and livestock production, and choosing low-risk irrigation sources. The panel also identified practices that appear ineffective at reducing food-safety risks, such as the removal of non-crop vegetation. Overall, these findings provide insights into the food-safety impacts of agricultural and land management practices that growers, auditors, and extension personnel can use to co-manage produce preharvest environments for food safety and other aims.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

A trait‐based framework for predicting foodborne pathogen risk from wild birds

Archive ouverte | Smith, Olivia | CCSD

International audience. Recent foodborne illness outbreaks have heightened pressures on growers to deter wildlife from farms, jeopardizing conservation efforts. However, it remains unclear which species, particularl...

Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture

Archive ouverte | Rasmussen, Laura Vang | CCSD

International audience. Agricultural simplification continues to expand at the expense of more diverse forms of agriculture. This simplification, for example, in the form of intensively managed monocultures, poses a...

Risk factors of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in livestock raised on diversified small-scale farms in California

Archive ouverte | Patterson, Laura | CCSD

International audience. The increasing number of diversified small-scale farms (DSSF) that raise outdoor-based livestock in the USA reflects growing consumer demand for sustainably produced food. Diversified farms a...

Chargement des enrichissements...