0 avis
Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal surgical routes in laparoscopic nodal staging for locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO IB3-IVA)
Archive ouverte
Edité par CCSD ; WB Saunders -
International audience. BACKGROUND: This study compares morbidity and mortality associated with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAAL) for pretherapeutic nodal staging of locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO IB3-IVA). METHODS: Pre-, per- and postoperative data of patients treated for locally advanced stage cervical cancer between 1999 and 2018 in 12 French referral centers (FRANCOGYN Study Group) were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: The study was conducted using a sample of 448 patients, of whom 223 (49,8%) underwent retroperitoneal (group 1) and 225 (50,2%) had transperitoneal PAAL (group 2). No differences were noted concerning clinical and histological characteristics between the two groups. Among these 448 patients, 23 (5,1%) had an intraoperative complication (9 (2,0%) in group 1 and 14 (3,1%) in group 2, p = 0.28) and 47 (10,5%) had a postoperative complication (22 (4,9%) in group 1 and 25 (5,6%) in group 2, p = 0.44), only one of which required revision surgery but the patient died. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (3.97 versus 4.88 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups; 34 of 223 patients in group 1 (15.3%) and 40 of 225 patients in group 2 (15.6%) died (HR = 0.968, 95% CI [0.591-1.585]). There was no significant difference in recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal PAAL appears as a valuable and safety surgical route for nodal staging in locally advanced cervical cancer compared with standard transperitoneal PAAL.
Consulter en ligne
Suggestions
Du même auteur
