Customized frozen embryo transfer after identification of the receptivity window with a transcriptomic approach improves the implantation and live birth rates in patients with repeated implantation failure

Archive ouverte

Haouzi, Delphine | Entezami, Frida | Torre, Antoine | Innocenti, Charlène | Antoine, Yannick | Mauries, Charlotte | Vincens, Claire | Bringer-Deutsch, Sophie | Gala, Anna | Ferrieres-Hoa, Alice | Ohl, Jeanine | Gonzalez Marti, Beatriz | Brouillet, Sophie | Hamamah, Samir

Edité par CCSD ; Springer -

International audience. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate outcome benefits expected in repeated implantation failure (RIF) patients ( n = 217) after customized embryo transfer based upon identification of the receptivity window by transcriptomic approach using the Win-Test. In this test, the expression of 11 endometrial genes known to be predictive of endometrial receptivity is assessed by RT-PCR in biopsies collected during the implantation window (6–9 days after the spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge during natural cycles, 5–9 days after progesterone administration during hormone replacement therapy cycles). Then, patients underwent either customized embryo transfer (cET, n = 157 patients) according to the Win-Test results or embryo transfer according to the classical procedure (control group, n = 60). Pregnancy and live birth rates were compared in the two groups. The Win-Test showed that in 78.5% of women, the receptivity window lasted less than 48 h, although it could be shorter (< 24 h, 9.5%) or longer (> 48 h, 12%). This highlighted that only in 20% of patients with RIF the endometrium would have been receptive if the classical embryo transfer protocol was followed. In the other 80% of patients, the receptivity window was delayed by 1–3 days relative to the classical timing. This suggests that implantation failure could be linked to inadequate timing of embryo transfer. In agreement, both implantation (22.7% vs. 7.2%) and live birth rates per patient (31.8% vs. 8.3%) were significantly higher in the cET group than in the control group. cET on the basis of the Win-Test results could be proposed to improve pregnancy and live birth rates. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04192396; December 5, 2019, retrospectively registered.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Faut-il raisonnablement proposer une cinquième tentative de fécondation in vitro après échecs répétés d’implantation ?

Archive ouverte | Bringer-Deutsch, Sophie | CCSD

International audience. Accepter ou non une cinquième tentative en fécondation in vitro reste aujourd’hui un sujet à débat, tant par les coûts engendrés pour la société que pour les faibles taux de grossesses obtenu...

SARS-CoV-2 and Implantation Window: Gene Expression Mapping of Human Endometrium and Preimplantation Embryo

Archive ouverte | Haouzi, Delphine | CCSD

International audience. Understanding whether SARS-CoV-2 could infect cells and tissues handled during ART is crucial for risk mitigation, especially during the implantation window when either endometrial biopsies a...

Endometrial Receptivity Profile in Patients with Premature Progesterone Elevation on the Day of hCG Administration

Archive ouverte | Haouzi, Delphine | CCSD

International audience. The impact of a premature elevation of serum progesterone level, the day of hCG administration in patients under controlled ovarian stimulation during IVF procedure, on human endometrial rece...

Chargement des enrichissements...