Safety and Persistence of Nalmefene Treatment for Alcohol Dependence. Results from Two Post-authorisation Safety Studies

Archive ouverte

Chick, Jonathan | Andersohn, Frank | Guillo, Sylvie | Borchert, Kathrin | Toussi, Massoud | Braun, Sebastian | Haas, Jennifer, S | Kuppan, Kavitha | Lemming, Ole, M | Reines, Elin, Heldbo | Tubach, Florence

Edité par CCSD ; Oxford University Press (OUP) -

International audience. AimsTwo post-authorisation studies assessed the safety and persistence of patients’ use of nalmefene.MethodsThe START study (EUPAS5678) was a non-interventional, multi-country, prospective, 18-month (8 follow-up visits) cohort study including outpatients initiating nalmefene for the first time. The multi-database retrospective cohort study (MDRC, EUPAS14083) included baseline and follow-up data from German, Swedish and UK healthcare databases. Both studies permitted ‘all comers’ without explicit exclusion criteria; predefined subgroups of interest included the elderly (≥65 years) as well as patients with significant psychiatric and/or somatic comorbidities.ResultsSTART study: Overall, the mean duration of nalmefene treatment was 10.3 ± 7.3 months (N = 1348), with 49.0% of patients treated for ≥1 year; frequent reasons for treatment discontinuation were ‘goal reached’ and ‘drug cost’. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were nausea (4.7%), dizziness (3.2%) and insomnia (2.0%). ADR rates appeared higher in the elderly subpopulation (18.6% reported ≥1 ADR vs. 12.0% in the total population) but were not higher in the other predefined subgroups.MDRC study: The database follow-up analysis followed 2892 patients over 18 months for whom the duration of nalmefene treatment was between 2 and 3 months and <5% of patients used nalmefene for ≥1 year.ConclusionsDespite the inclusion of a wider patient population (e.g. elderly patients and those with relevant co-morbidities), the safety and tolerability profile of nalmefene given in routine practice was consistent with previous clinical studies. The differing rates of persistence beyond 1 year likely reflect the different methodologies and highlight the relevance of psychosocial support at follow-up visits.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

International and multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the use of biologics in systemic lupus erythematosus

Archive ouverte | Kleinmann, Jean-François | CCSD

International audience. Background/purpose: Despite conventional immunosuppressants, active and steroid-dependent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a therapeutic challenge. Only one biologic, belimumab, ...

Cervical cancer screening coverage, management of squamous intraepithelial lesions and related costs in France

Archive ouverte | de Rycke, Yann | CCSD

International audience. Until 2018, cervical cancer screening in France was an unorganized individual screening, with the exception of some pilot programs in some territories. We aimed to assess, before the implemen...

Benzodiazepines for pediatric epilepsies and their risks in a cohort within the French health care data

Archive ouverte | Auvin, Stéphane | CCSD

International audience. Objective: The management of antiseizure treatment in patients with epilepsy relies on the benefit–risk ratio. Data on antiseizure medication (ASM) use in children are limited. We described a...

Chargement des enrichissements...