Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS. : Am J Cardiovasc Drugs

Archive ouverte

Blin, P. | Dureau-Pournin, C. | Benichou, Jacques | Cottin, Y. | Mismetti, P. | Abouelfath, A. | Lassalle, R. | Droz, C. | Moore, Nicholas

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag -

International audience. BackgroundClinical trials have indicated that the direct-acting oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban have better risk/benefit profiles than do vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).ObjectiveOur objective was to compare the 1-year real-life risk of major clinical events with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus VKAs for NVAF.MethodsThis was a high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS)-matched cohort study of new users of dabigatran, rivaroxaban or VKAs for NVAF in the French national healthcare systems database in 2013 followed-up for 1 year [22]. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical events and death were determined during exposure.ResultsIn 2013, a total of 103,101 new anticoagulant users had definite NVAF: 44,653 VKA, 27,060 dabigatran, and 31,388 rivaroxaban. In matched populations, HRs were as follows for dabigatran versus VKAs (20,489 per group): stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) 0.75 (95% CI 0.63–0.88), clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) 0.58 (95% CI 0.51–0.66), hemorrhagic stroke (HS) 0.22 (95% CI 0.14–0.36), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) 0.98 (95% CI 0.80–1.19), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) 0.79 (95% CI 0.65–0.95), death 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.82), composite (any of the above) 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.76). For matched rivaroxaban versus VKA (23,053 per group) HRs were as follows: SSE 0.98 (95% CI 0.85–1.14), CRB 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.92), HS 0.65 (95% CI 0.49–0.87), GIB 1.08 (95% CI 0.90–1.30), ACS 0.84 (95% CI 0.71–1.00), death 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.84), composite 0.84 (95% CI 0.79–0.89). Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death were 49 ± 0.05 with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus VKAs.ConclusionConsistent with results from clinical trials and other observational studies, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were at least as effective and safer than VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in NVAF over 1 year in the French population.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Effectiveness and safety of 110 or 150 mg dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. : Br J Clin Pharmacol

Archive ouverte | Blin, P. | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: We compared the 1-year safety and effectiveness of dabigatran 110 mg (D110) or 150 mg (D150) to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF...

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Standard or Reduced Dose Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. : Clin Pharmacol Ther

Archive ouverte | Blin, P. | CCSD

International audience. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban at standard (SD) or reduced doses (RD) have been compared to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but not to each other. This was a new user study o...

Benefit-risk profile of dabigatran compared with vitamin-K antagonists in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from a cohort study in the French nationwide claims database. : European Heart Journal

Archive ouverte | Cottin, Y. | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...