Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

Archive ouverte

Kleijn, David | Winfree, Rachael | Bartomeus, Ignasi | Carvalheira, Luisa G. | Henry, Mickaël | Isaacs, Rufus | Klein, Alexandra-Maria | Kremen, Claire | M'Gonigle, Leithen | Rader, Romina | Ricketts, Taylor H. | Williams, Neal M. | Adamson, Nancy Lee | Ascher, John S. | Baldi, Andras | Batáry, Péter | Benjamin, Faye | Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. | Blitzer, Eleanor J. | Bommarco, Riccardo | Brand, Mariëtte R. | Bretagnolle, Vincent | Button, Lindsey | Cariveau, Daniel P. | Chifflet, Rémy | Colville, Jonathan F. | Danforth, Bryan N. | Elle, Elizabeth | Garratt, Michael P.D. | Herzog, Felix | Holzschuh, Andrea | Howlett, Brad G. | Jauker, Frank | Jha, Shalene | Knop, Eva | Krewenka, Kristin | Le Feon, Violette | Mandelik, Yael | May, Emily A. | Park, Mia G. | Pisanty, Gideon | Reemer, Menno | Riedinger, Verena | Rollin, Orianne | Rundlöf, Maj | Sardiñas, Hillary S. | Scheper, Jeroen | Sciligo, Amber R. | Smith, Henrik G. | Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf | Thorp, Robbin | Tscharntke, Teja | Verhulst, Jort | Viana, Blandina F. | Vaissière, Bernard | Veldtman, Ruan | Westphal, Catrin | Potts, Simon G.

Edité par CCSD ; Nature Publishing Group -

International audience. There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

Archive ouverte | de Palma, Adriana | CCSD

International audience. Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' response...

Agricultural policies exacerbate honeybee pollination service supply-demand mismatches across Europe

Archive ouverte | Breeze, Tom D. | CCSD

Erratum : DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0091459 Clé UT : 000332396200255. International audience. Declines in insect pollinators across Europe have raised concerns about the supply of pollination services to agricultur...

Developing European conservation and mitigation tools for pollination services: approaches of the STEP (Status and Trends of European Pollinators) project

Archive ouverte | Potts, Simon G. | CCSD

International audience. Pollinating insects form a key component of European biodiversity, and provide a vital ecosystem service to crops and wild plants. There is growing evidence of declines in both wild and domes...

Chargement des enrichissements...