Prehospital high-dose tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. The AGIR-2 study

Archive ouverte

El Khoury, C. | Dubien, P-Y. | Belle, L. | Debaty, G. | Capel, O. | Perret, T. | Savary, D. | Serre, P. | Bonnefoy-Cudraz, E. | Bissery, A. | Ecochard, René | Plattner, V. | Mercier, Catherine

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier ; Société française de cardiologie [2008-....] -

International audience. Background. - Compared with administration in the catheterization laboratory, early treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors provides benefits to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous intervention. Whether this benefit is maintained on top of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is unknown.Methods. - In a multicentre, controlled, randomized study, 320 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention received a high-dose bolus of tirofiban given either in the ambulance (prehospital group) or in the catheterization laboratory. The primary endpoint was a TIMI flow grade 2-3 of the infarct-related vessel at initial angiography. Secondary endpoints included ST-segment resolution 1 h after percutaneous coronary intervention and peak serum troponin I concentration.Results. - Tirofiban was administered 48 (95% confidence interval 21.4-75.0) min earlier in the prehospital group. At initial angiography, the combined incidence of TIMI 2-3 flow was 39.7% in the catheterization-laboratory group and 44.2% in the prehospital group (p = 0.45). No difference was found on postpercutaneous intervention angiography or peak troponin concentration. Complete ST-segment resolution 60 min after the start of intervention was 55.4% in the catheterization-laboratory group and 52.6% in the prehospital group (p = 0.32).Conclusion. - Prehospital initiation of high-dose bolus tirofiban did not improve significantly initial TIMI 2 or 3 flow of the infarct-related artery or complete ST-segment resolution after coronary intervention compared with initiation of tirofiban in the catheterization laboratory

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Breast MRI in DCIS: benefits and limits. Intérêt et limites de l'IRM dans les CCIS

Archive ouverte | El Khoury, C. | CCSD

Colloque avec actes et comité de lecture. Internationale.. International audience

Guide des outils d’évaluation en médecine d’urgence

Archive ouverte | Debaty, Guillaume | CCSD

International audience

Assessment of gender-related differences in management of stroke: evaluation of clinical practices in a French registry

Archive ouverte | Fraticelli, L. | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...