Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives

Archive ouverte

Rouanet, Philippe | Bertrand, Martin Marie | Jarlier, Marta | Mourregot, Anne | Traore, Drissa | Taoum, Christophe | de Forges, Hélène | Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag -

International audience. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to compare robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) with laparoscopic TME (L-TME) in a series of consecutive rectal cancer patients.BACKGROUND:R-TME and L-TME have drawn contradictory reports. A recent phase III trial (ROLARR) concluded that R-TME performed by surgeons with varying experience did not confer an advantage in rectal cancer resection.PATIENTS AND METHODS:In this retrospective single-center cohort study (8/2008 to 4/2015), data were prospectively registered. A total of 200 L-TME and 200 R-TME were operated consecutively without selection. The primary outcome was the conversion rate to open laparotomy or transanal TME. The secondary endpoints were type of anastomosis, operative time, postoperative morbidity, circumferential radial (CRM) and distal margins, quality of life, bladder and sexual dysfunction, and oncological outcomes.RESULTS:Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Type of anastomosis [colo-anal anastomosis (CAA) 40% vs 49%; p < 0.001], transanal TME (5% vs 13%; p = 0.005), and conversion rate (2% vs 9.5%; odd ratio (OR): 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.60]) were significantly different. Intersphincteric resection (39% vs 47%), diverting stoma (66.5% vs 68%), CRM involvement, median operative time (243 vs 232 min), and R0 resection rate were similar. Conversion risk was lower for R-TME in male patients and those with small tumors (< 5 cm). The 3-year overall survival rate was 84.1% [77.3-88.9%] and 88.4% [82.9-92.2%] in the R-TME and L-TME group. No significant differences were reported in quality of life, and urinary or sexual function.CONCLUSIONS:R-TME is less likely to be converted to open surgery than L-TME; operative time and curative pathologic criteria are equivalent. Future prospective trial should compare standardized procedures performed by experienced surgeons for subgroups of high-risk patients.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Standardized single docking, four arms and fully robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer: the key points are the ports and arms placement

Archive ouverte | Bertrand, Martin Marie | CCSD

International audience. Rectal cancer continues to be a surgical challenge. As more technology is developed, the surgeon must both incorporate this new technology into his practice and, at the same time, keep improv...

Oncoplastic Resection of Breast Cancers Located in the Lower-Inner or Lower-Outer Quadrant with the Modified McKissock Mammaplasty Technique

Archive ouverte | Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND:Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer (BC) may result in postoperative morbidity that can delay adjuvant treatment(s). The McKissock procedure is a reliable mammaplasty technique u...

Determination of biomarkers associated with neoadjuvant treatment response focusing on colibactin-producing Escherichia coli in patients with mid or low rectal cancer. – Final Symposium of Inserm Cross-Cutting

Archive ouverte | Taoum, Christophe | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...