Sex Differences in Adenosine-Free Coronary Pressure Indexes A CONTRAST Substudy

Archive ouverte

Shah, S. V. | Zimmermann, F. M. | Johnson, N. P. | Nishi, T. | Kobayashi, Y. | Witt, N. | Berry, C. | Jeremias, A. | Koo, B. K. | Esposito, G. | Rioufol, Gilles | Park, S. J. | Oldroyd, K. G. | Barbato, E. | Pijls, N. H. J. | de Bruyne, B. | Fearon, W. F. | Investigators, Contrast Study

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier/American College of Cardiology -

International audience. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to investigate sex differences in adenosine-free coronary pressure indexes. BACKGROUND Several adenosine-free coronary pressure wire indexes have been proposed to assess the functional significance of coronary artery lesions; however, there is a theoretical concern that sex differences may affect diagnostic performance because of differences in resting flow and distal myocardial mass. METHODS In this CONTRAST (Can Contrast Injection Better Approximate FFR Compared to Pure Resting Physiology?) substudy, contrast fractional flow reserve (cFFR), obtained during contrast-induced submaximal hyperemia, the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and distal/proximal coronary pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) were compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in 547 men and 216 women. Using FFR \textless= 0.8 as a reference, the diagnostic performance of each index was compared. RESULTS Men and women had similar diameter stenosis (p = 0.78), but women were less likely to have FFR \textless= 0.80 than men (42.5% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.04). Sensitivity was similar among cFFR, iFR, and Pd/Pa when comparing women and men, respectively (cFFR, 77.5% vs. 75.3%; p = 0.69; iFR, 84.9% vs. 79.4%; p = 0.30; Pd/Pa, 78.8% vs. 77.3%; p = 0.78). cFFR was more specific than iFR or Pd/Pa regardless of sex (cFFR, 94.3% vs. 95.8%; p = 0.56; iFR, 75.6% vs. 80.1%; p = 0.38; Pd/Pa, 80.6% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.69). By receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, cFFR provided better diagnostic accuracy than resting indexes irrespective of sex (p \textless= 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Despite the theoretical concern, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of cFFR, iFR, and Pd/Pa did not differ between the sexes. Irrespective of sex, cFFR provides the best diagnostic performance. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Predictive factors of discordance between the instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve

Archive ouverte | Derimay, F. | CCSD

International audience

Continuum of Vasodilator Stress From Rest to Contrast Medium to Adenosine Hyperemia for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment

Archive ouverte | Johnson, N. P. | CCSD

International audience. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the diagnostic performance with adenosine-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) \textless/=0.8 of contrast-based FFR (cFFR), resting distal pressure (Pd)/aorti...

Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes

Archive ouverte | Johnson, N. P. | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an established tool for guiding treatment, but its graded relationship to clinical outcomes as modulated by medical therapy versus revascu...

Chargement des enrichissements...