Comparative validation of single-shot optical techniques for laparoscopic 3-D surface reconstruction

Archive ouverte

Maier-Hein, L. | Groch, A. | Bartoli, A. | Bodenstedt, S. | Boissonnat, G. | Chang, P.-L. | Clancy, N. T. | Elson, D. S. | Haase, S. | Heim, E. | Hornegger, J. | Jannin, Pierre | Kenngott, H. | Kilgus, T. | Müller-Stich, B. | Oladokun, D. | Röhl, S. | dos Santos, T. R. | Schlemmer, H.-P. | Seitel, A. | Speidel, S. | Wagner, M. | Stoyanov, D.

Edité par CCSD ; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers -

International audience. Intra-operative imaging techniques for obtaining the shape and morphology of soft-tissue surfaces in vivo are a key enabling technology for advanced surgical systems. Different optical techniques for 3-D surface reconstruction in laparoscopy have been proposed, however, so far no quantitative and comparative validation has been performed. Furthermore, robustness of the methods to clinically important factors like smoke or bleeding has not yet been assessed. To address these issues, we have formed a joint international initiative with the aim of validating different state-of-the-art passive and active reconstruction methods in a comparative manner. In this comprehensive in vitro study, we investigated reconstruction accuracy using different organs with various shape and texture and also tested reconstruction robustness with respect to a number of factors like the pose of the endoscope as well as the amount of blood or smoke present in the scene. The study suggests complementary advantages of the different techniques with respect to accuracy, robustness, point density, hardware complexity and computation time. While reconstruction accuracy under ideal conditions was generally high, robustness is a remaining issue to be addressed. Future work should include sensor fusion and in vivo validation studies in a specific clinical context. To trigger further research in surface reconstruction, stereoscopic data of the study will be made publically available at www.open-CAS.com upon publication of the paper.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Why is the Winner the Best?

Archive ouverte | Eisenmann, M. | CCSD

International audience. International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating...

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual patient data comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer

Archive ouverte | Müller-Stich, B. | CCSD

International audience. Abstract Background Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) for oesophageal cancer may reduce surgical complications compared with open oesophagectomy. MIO is, however, technically challengin...

ADAPTATIONSFÄHIGKEIT ALS LEISTUNGSMERKMAL BEIM SCHWEIN

Archive ouverte | Haase, S. | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...