Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Archive ouverte

Bauersachs, Rupert | Berkowitz, Scott D | Brenner, Benjamin | Buller, Harry R | Decousus, Hervé | Gallus, Alex S | Lensing, Anthonie W | Misselwitz, Frank | Prins, Martin H | Raskob, Gary E | Segers, Annelise | Verhamme, Peter | Wells, Phil | Agnelli, Giancarlo | Bounameaux, Henri | Cohen, Alexander | Davidson, Bruce L | Piovella, Franco | Schellong, Sebastian | Mottier, Dominique

Edité par CCSD ; Massachusetts Medical Society -

International audience. BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for treating acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and for continued treatment, without the need for laboratory monitoring. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized, event-driven, noninferiority study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic DVT. In parallel, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, event-driven superiority study that compared rivaroxaban alone (20 mg once daily) with placebo for an additional 6 or 12 months in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome for both studies was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the initial-treatment study and major bleeding in the continued-treatment study. RESULTS: The study of rivaroxaban for acute DVT included 3449 patients: 1731 given rivaroxaban and 1718 given enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. Rivaroxaban had noninferior efficacy with respect to the primary outcome (36 events [2.1%], vs. 51 events with enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonist [3.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.04; P<0.001). The principal safety outcome occurred in 8.1% of the patients in each group. In the continued-treatment study, which included 602 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 594 in the placebo group, rivaroxaban had superior efficacy (8 events [1.3%], vs. 42 with placebo [7.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.39; P<0.001). Four patients in the rivaroxaban group had nonfatal major bleeding (0.7%), versus none in the placebo group (P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban offers a simple, single-drug approach to the short-term and continued treatment of venous thrombosis that may improve the benefit-to-risk profile of anticoagulation. (Funded by Bayer Schering Pharma and Ortho-McNeil; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00440193 and NCT00439725.).

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

Archive ouverte | Renseigné, Non | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been shown to be as effective as standard anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis, wi...

Extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with idraparinux.

Archive ouverte | Renseigné, Non | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: The extended use of vitamin K antagonists for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism is often constrained by risk-benefit limitations and inconvenience. We evaluated the effic...

Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease.

Archive ouverte | Renseigné, Non | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is treated with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by a vitamin K antagonist. We investigated the potential use of idraparinux...

Chargement des enrichissements...