Current status and future challenges of genotoxicity OECD Test Guidelines for nanomaterials: a workshop report

Archive ouverte

Doak, Shareen, H. | Andreoli, Cristina | Burgum, Michael, J | Chaudhry, Qasim | Bleeker, Eric, a J | Bossa, Cecilia | Domenech, Josefa | Drobne, Damjana | Fessard, Valérie | Jeliazkova, Nina | Longhin, Eleonora | Rundén-Pran, Elise | Stępnik, Maciej | El Yamani, Naouale | Catalán, Julia | Dusinska, Maria

Edité par CCSD ; Oxford University Press (OUP) -

Issue Section: Meeting Report. International audience. Genotoxicity testing for nanomaterials remains challenging as standard testing approaches require some adaptation, and further development of nano-specific OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) and Guidance Documents (GDs) are needed. However, the field of genotoxicology continues to progress and new approach methodologies (NAMs) are being developed that could provide relevant information on the range of mechanisms of genotoxic action that may be imparted by nanomaterials. There is a recognition of the need for implementation of new and/or adapted OECD TGs, new OECD GDs, and utilization of NAMs within a genotoxicity testing framework for nanomaterials. As such, the requirements to apply new experimental approaches and data for genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials in a regulatory context is neither clear, nor used in practice. Thus, an international workshop with representatives from regulatory agencies, industry, government, and academic scientists was convened to discuss these issues. The expert discussion highlighted the current deficiencies that exist in standard testing approaches within exposure regimes, insufficient physicochemical characterization, lack of demonstration of cell or tissue uptake and internalization, and limitations in the coverage of genotoxic modes of action. Regarding the latter aspect, a consensus was reached on the importance of using NAMs to support the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials. Also highlighted was the need for close engagement between scientists and regulators to (i) provide clarity on the regulatory needs, (ii) improve the acceptance and use of NAM-generated data, and (iii) define how NAMs may be used as part of weight of evidence approaches for use in regulatory risk assessments.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

A template wizard for the cocreation of machine-readable data-reporting to harmonize the evaluation of (nano)materials

Archive ouverte | Jeliazkova, Nina | CCSD

International audience. Making research data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) is typically hampered by a lack of skills in technical aspects of data management by data generators and a lack of...

Hazard assessment of nanomaterials using in vitro toxicity assays: Guidance on potential assay interferences and mitigating actions to avoid biased results

Archive ouverte | El Yamani, Naouale | CCSD

International audience. The movement towards an animal-free testing approach for risk assessment represents a key paradigm shift in toxicology. Risk assessment of engineered and anthropogenic nanoscale materials (NM...

Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies Demonstrated in Terms of its Applicability to Nanomaterials

Archive ouverte | Isigonis, Panagiotis | CCSD

International audience. Nanotechnologies have reached maturity and market penetration that require nano-specific changes in legislation and harmonization among legislation domains, such as the amendments to REACH fo...

Chargement des enrichissements...